8 edition of On raising: one rule of English grammar and its theoretical implications found in the catalog.
Bibliography: p. -433.
|Statement||[by] Paul M. Postal.|
|Series||Current studies in linguistics series ;, 5|
|LC Classifications||PE1380 .P6|
|The Physical Object|
|Pagination||xvi, 447 p.|
|Number of Pages||447|
|LC Control Number||73016482|
On Raising: One Rule of English Grammar and Its Theoretical Implications Paul M. Postal 6. French Syntax: The Transformational Cycle Richard S. Kayne 7. Panini * as a Variationist Paul Kiparsky. S. D. Joshi, editor 8. Semantics and Cognition Ray Jackendoff 9. Modularity in Syntax: A Study of Japanese and English Ann Kathleen Farmer On Raising: An Inquiry into One Rule of English Grammar and Its Theoretical Implications (Current Studies in Linguistics) Paul M. Postal $
ChrisLands provides an easy and affordable solution to operating your own online store. We have provided the new, used, out-of-print, and antiquarian independent bookseller with a full ecommerce bookstore solution since Title: Clause-mates, Phases and Two Families of Questions Family of questions (sometimes called pair-list) readings (here abbreviated FoQ) with WHs and universal quantifiers most typically arise when the WH originates in the same clause as the universal: (1) Who did everyone see FoQ (2) Who do you think everyone saw FoQ May () presented an important analysis of some.
Linguists' inability to reach consensus about the surface structure of infinitive-complement sentences with verbs likebelieve is a consequence of unresolved foundational disputes about the nature of generative grammar. Naive native speakers' linguistic intuitions about sentences of this type, as assessed by elicitation of judgments about surface structure, also fail to provide a solution to Cited by: 1. The focus of this paper is on apparent cases of subject-to-subject raising out of finite clauses in English, which are accepted as (fully) grammatical by a minority of native speakers. The basic pattern involves a bi-clausal structure in which a displaced subject triggers agreement in both the embedded and the matrix clause. Crucially, this ‘double agreement’ pattern is only acceptable.
Pupils with mental or educational disabilities
Fever Volume 1
Feasibility of alternative methods of financing retirement system costs in the State of Washington
Ulsters shared heritage
Minnesota felony driving while impaired
De La Salle brothers in Great Britain
The 2000 Import and Export Market for Bakery Products, Bread, Biscuits, and Cakes in Denmark (World Trade Report)
Latino/a rights and justice in the United States
Data from core analyses, aquifer testing, and geophysical logging of Denver Basin bedrock aquifers at Castle Pines, Colorado
Free market zones
On raising: one rule of English grammar and its theoretical implications. (Current studies in linguistics series, 5) Bibliography: p.
English language—Sentences. English language—Grammar, Generative. Title. PEP6 ISBN File Size: 7MB. On Raising: one rule of English grammar and its theoretical implications. By PAUL M. POSTAL. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Pp. xvi, Reviewed by EMMON BACH, University of Massachusetts 1. INTRODUCTION. In this review,?1 outlines the major issues raised in Postal's monograph.
In?2, I evaluate a number of P's arguments and conclusions. In?3,Cited by: "An in-depth analysis of the transformational rule that converts the deep structure subjects of complement clauses into the surface structure objects of main verbs.
After adopting McCawley's position that English is a verb-initial language, Postal offers extensive and convincing evidence that Raising does exist in English, a position directly. On raising: one rule of English grammar and its theoretical implications.
[Paul Martin Postal] Home. WorldCat Home About WorldCat Help. Search. Search for Library Items Search for Lists Search for # English language--Grammar, Generative\/span>\n \u00A0\u00A0\u00A0\n schema.
On Raising: One Rule of English Grammar and Its Theoretical Implications by Paul M. Postal A copy that has been read, but remains in clean condition. All pages are intact, and the cover is intact. The spine may show signs of wear. For some time it has been generally accepted by students of English grammar that a rule of Raising exists and that it functions to produce derived main clause subjects.
Following Rosenbaum's work, it has also been widely accepted that this rule functions in a specified class of cases to derive main clause objects.
However, in recent work, Chomsky has rejected the view that there is any Raising. Lessons in English grammar. [REVIEW] F. Delatte - - Revue Belge de Philologie Et D’Histoire 10 (3) Wittgenstein’s Account of Rule-Following and Its : Paul M. Postal. In linguistics, raising constructions involve the movement of an argument from an embedded or subordinate clause to a matrix or main clause; in other words, a raising predicate/verb appears with a syntactic argument that is not its semantic argument, but is rather the semantic argument of an embedded predicate.
Although English has raising constructions, not all languages do. Review of Paul Postal On Raising: One Rule of English Grammar and its Theoretical Implications. Authors. Emmon Bach Follow. Publication Date.
September Journal or Book Title. Language. DOI. / Pages. Volume. Issue. Recommended Citation. Bach, Emmon, "Review of Paul Postal On Raising: One Rule of English Cited by: Postal, Paul M. () On Raising: One Rule of English Grammar and Its Theoretical Implications. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Cambridge: MIT Press. ISBN Raising: One rule of English grammar and its theoretical implications, MIT Press for more than anybody would want to know about testing for Raising), but the two easiest ones to understand and apply are the Funny NP test and the Passive Equivalence Size: KB.
One Rule of English Grammar and Its Theoretical Implications Paul M. Postal For some time it has been generally accepted by students of English grammar that a rule of Raising exists and that it functions to produce derived main clause subjects.
A 'read' is counted each time someone views a publication summary (such as the title, abstract, and list of authors), clicks on a figure, or views or downloads the full-text. On Raising: One Rule of English Grammar and its Theoretical Implications, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press Postma, G.
‘Zero semantics’, PhD diss., Holland Institute of LinguisticsCited by: On Raising: One Rule of English Grammar and Its Theoretical Implications by Paul M.
Postal. MIT Press, Paperback. As New. Disclaimer:An apparently unread copy in perfect condition. Dust cover is intact; pages are clean and are not marred by notes or folds of any kind. Postal, Paul M. On Raising: One Rule of English Grammar and Its Theoretical Implications.
Cambridge: MIT P, Skeptical Linguistic Essays. Oxford: Oxford UP, Reeves, Ruth. "De Se and Non De Se Representation." Geometric and Thematic Structure in Binding.
Linguist On-line Conference 14 Oct Nov. Case is fundamental to the whole system of language. One of its most interesting features is the recurrence of apparently idiosyncratic patterns and devices in otherwise unrelated languages. This book picks out these recurring strategies and explores their by: Paul M.
Postal has 20 books on Goodreads with 38 ratings. Paul M. Postal’s most popular book is Skeptical Linguistic Essays. Definition. Right node raising is an operation of reduction on coordinated clauses whose rightmost constituents are identical.
Example. Right Node Raising derives the structure in (i)b from the underlying structure in (i)a by adjoining one copy of the identical constituents (the book) to the right of the sentence, and deleting the identical originals (indicated by e). On Raising: One Rule of English Grammar and its Theoretical Implications MIT Press, Cambridge, MA Google Scholar [Ross ] Ross, J.R.
Constraints on Variables in Cited by: 1. Raising: One rule of English grammar and its theoretical implications, MIT Press for more than anybody would want to know about testing for Raising), but the two easiest ones to understand and apply are the Funny NP test and the Passive Equivalence test.
The objective of this book is to develop a force-recipient account of English resultatives. Within this approach the post-verbal NP is a recipient of a verbal force, whether it is a subcategorized object or not, and the verbal force being exerted onto the post-verbal NP is responsible for bringing about the change as specified by the result : In Maya group of eminent linguists met in Athens to debate the road ahead for generative grammar.
There was a lot of discussion, and the linguists expressed the intention to draw a list of achievements of generative grammar, for the benefit of other linguists and of the field in : Roberta D’Alessandro.